the comparative analysis of the typological categories of gender

DOCX 52.5 KB Free download

Page preview (5 pages)

Scroll down 👇

the comparative ana.docx comparative typology of english and uzbek the comparative analysis of the typological categories of gender plan: introduction 1. main part 1.1 the problem of parts of speech 1.2 typological category of case 1.3 typological category of gender 1.4 typological category of plurality 2. typological category of person 2.1 typological categories of tense and aspect conclusion introduction a silence would be a lonely world. to listen, to answer, to share our thought and ideas through speech and hearing this is one of the most exciting ports of being human. it is no doubt true that students grow toward maturity and independence of thought as they progress through the grades; but this growth is not as a rule a sharp and sudden one, nor does the psychology of the students undergo any great change during the various levels of the fundamental principles that underlie the work of the university …

ence. the student made her own investigation finding many examples of comparison not only in english, and in uzbek. materials and literature which she used were «the comparative typology of english and turkic languages», the lectures on «comparative typology» and «theory of phonetics» by a. abduazizov. the qualification work consists of several parts where she opened and analyzed the theme. 1. main part a word is known as the smallest naming unit of the language. according to l. bloomfield, word is a minimum free form. close observation and comparison of words clearly shows that a great number of words have a composite nature and are made up of smaller units, each possessing sound-form and meaning. in other words, the term word denotes the basic unit of a given language resulting from the association of a particular meaning with a particular group of sounds capable of a grammatical employment is a …

of mood, tense, aspect, voice, person, number etc., noun – case, number, adjective – comparison, etc. the parts of speech also differ from each other in their syntactic function; e.g. verbs are used in the sentence structure as predicates, nouns-as subjects, adjectives-as attributes etc. all words of the comparing languages may be divided into three main groups: 1. notional words 2. structural words 3. independent elements notional words have distinct lexical meanings and perform independent syntactic functions in the sentence structure, they serve as primary or secondary parts of the sentence. to this group belong the following parts of speech: noun, verb, adjective, pronouns, numerals, statives and adverbs. it should be kept in mind that statives in uzbek are otter interchanged with adjectives and not treated as an independent part of speech. structural words differ from the notional words semantically their lexical meaning is of a more general character than …

mes independent elements can even serve as sentences themselves; e.g. yes, no, alas. independent class of words include modal words, interjections, words of affirmation and negation. it is noteworthy that the decision of words into parts of speech can be accepted only with certain reservation there are words which cannot be classed among any of the above motioned parts of speech such as a please, anyway ҳар қалай. typological categories of english and uzbek words the words of any language are characterized by their ability to express definite notions existing in this society, thus changing their forms. most of the notions existing in the society have common peculiarities, i.e. they have universal character. among the linguistic categories which can be traced in most of the languages of the world we can see the categories which display typologically general character but can be expressed in different languages in different ways. studying …

(subject) and possessive (genitive) cases. the common case is characterized by a zero morpheme (suffix) e.g. child, boy, student, ir. and the possessive case by the indexing is and its phonetic variants as [s] and [z]. the uzbek бош келишиги (common or subject case) corresponds in meaning and function to the english common case both of them are unmarked member of the case opposition and perform similar syntactic function in the sentence structure. english common case and other five cases of uzbek are marked members of the case opposition in both languages. the english possessive case is marked by the stiffly is which can sometimes be substituted by the preposition of (e.g. my father’s room, the room of may father) and therefore is sometimes called of – genitive – case. this case denotes possession of a thing or a person and in uzbek it has its correspondence in the uzbek …

Want to read more?

Download the full file for free via Telegram.

Download full file

About "the comparative analysis of the typological categories of gender "

the comparative ana.docx comparative typology of english and uzbek the comparative analysis of the typological categories of gender plan: introduction 1. main part 1.1 the problem of parts of speech 1.2 typological category of case 1.3 typological category of gender 1.4 typological category of plurality 2. typological category of person 2.1 typological categories of tense and aspect conclusion introduction a silence would be a lonely world. to listen, to answer, to share our thought and ideas through speech and hearing this is one of the most exciting ports of being human. it is no doubt true that students grow toward maturity and independence of thought as they progress through the grades; but this growth is not as a rule a …

DOCX format, 52.5 KB. To download "the comparative analysis of the typological categories of gender ", click the Telegram button on the left.

Tags: the comparative analysis of the… DOCX Free download Telegram