major parameters identifying the branches of linguistic typology

DOC 39.0 KB Free download

Page preview (5 pages)

Scroll down 👇

1451618700_62786.doc major parameters identifying the branches of linguistic typology plan: 1.genetic diachronic typology; 2.genetic synchronic typology; 3.distinctive features of genetic typology the scholars who contributed to elaboration of major parameters of linguistic typology are roman jacobson, vazlav skalichka, joseph greenberg, boris uspenskiy, yuri rojdestvenskiy, vladimir ghak, etc. i. system/structural identity ii. genetic identity iii. quantitative limitation/non-limitation iv. areal limitation v. etic/emic identity vi. deep and surface identity vii. one level approach to comparison viii. cross-level approach to comparison ix. content approach x. formal approach xi. limitation of ctalon language xii. completion of typological operations. i. system/structural identity implies identity of language types. here we should distinguish between type of language and type in language. a) the type of language is related to structural/typological classification of languages is meant. the most popular classification of language types includes: agglutinating, flexional, isolative and polysynthetic languages. these types are identified based on the unity …

a certain type of linguistic universal, etc. iv. areal limitation/non-limitation looks at the expansion of a certain linguistic phenomenon which is geographically conditioned (centum and satem languages, study of dialects, sub-stratum and super-stratum languages). v. etic/emic identity. etic identity means coincidence of material units. vi. deep and surface identity. surface structure includes all material units of a language. surface structure units may belong to different levels of hierarchy. for example, english category of defi-niteness may be expressed by articles and demonstrative pronouns. deep structure is a generalized language meaning lying in the basis of compared languages. deep structure maybe of three types: a) minimal or internal language structure; b) typological deep structure, c) maximal deep stricture. minimal deep structure characterizes the units of content plan of a separate language. each language has its own categorial notions, e.g. categories of definiteness/ indefiniteness, transitiveness, etc. which constitute a deep structure of that …

. regarding modern turkic languages there is a lot of material/substantial conformity. on the basis of etic-emic organization in every language family or language group special areal groups are distinguished. b) an example typological deep structure with emic organized identity: typological classification based on level coincidence (agglutination, fusion, isolation). maximal deep structure is a common deep structure peculiar to several language types: e.g. analytism /synthetism 1. one level approach to comparison or level isolation. it is effective when comparing closely related languages which have similar level means to express the same categorial notion. e.g. morpheme of plurality: uzb -jiap, flap, tap, hap; refer to the same morphological level. 2. cross-level approach is opposed to level isolation and used to identifycross-level correspondences. for example, how can we compare the category of reflexivity of english and russian when english does not have a grammatical category of reflexivity. in such cases other level …

nguage.'9 6. completion of typological operations. any typological operation undergoes two steps: a) synthesis b) correspondence of typological operation may be complete or limited/unlimited. limitation is possibly to be applied in different languages considering the levels of hierarchy,etc. it mainly depends on the purposes of comparison and research. in both languages there is a possibility to express age on the morphological level, but in english morpheme - ies cannot be used with any other morpheme while in uzbek other morphemes can be added to -lar, thus showing that english refers to fiexional languages according to its structure and uzbek is an agglutinating language. the above example illustrates structural non-identity of compared languages. in genetically closely related languages etic and emic identity is observed as is seen in the above table, while etic non-identity is observed in genetically non-related languages. in turkic languages there is both etic and emic identity (-lar …

ets 2) the notion of color in compared languages. bibliography 1. modern english in action, henry i. christ, dc heath and company, boston 2001. 2. mountains are climbing, study book, boston 2003y. 3. english phonetic, a.a. abduazizov издательство «укитувчи» т. 1972 г. 4. reference guide to english, alice maclin, usa washington 1994 5. improve your sentence, ann m. sala, mccraw-hill, usa. 1999y 6. language for daily use mildred a dawson new york, 2001y 7. new english voyages in english, francis b. connors, loyola university. press, chicago 1991y 8. writing skills, suzanne chance, clencoe, mccraw-hill. new york 9. reading and writing, natasha haugnes 10. contemporary english, mechella perrott, contemporary publisher group, illinois usa. 11. beginning english writing skills, mone scherago, national textbook company, illinois usa. 12. lectures of comparative typology, c. satimov, m. просвещениею 1991 г. 13. comparative typology v.d. arakin, m. «prosveshenie» 1991 14. comparative grammar, j.i.

Want to read more?

Download the full file for free via Telegram.

Download full file

About "major parameters identifying the branches of linguistic typology"

1451618700_62786.doc major parameters identifying the branches of linguistic typology plan: 1.genetic diachronic typology; 2.genetic synchronic typology; 3.distinctive features of genetic typology the scholars who contributed to elaboration of major parameters of linguistic typology are roman jacobson, vazlav skalichka, joseph greenberg, boris uspenskiy, yuri rojdestvenskiy, vladimir ghak, etc. i. system/structural identity ii. genetic identity iii. quantitative limitation/non-limitation iv. areal limitation v. etic/emic identity vi. deep and surface identity vii. one level approach to comparison viii. cross-level approach to comparison ix. content approach x. formal approach xi. limitation of ctalon language xii. completion of typological operations. i. system/structural identity implies...

DOC format, 39.0 KB. To download "major parameters identifying the branches of linguistic typology", click the Telegram button on the left.

Tags: major parameters identifying th… DOC Free download Telegram