basic characters in morphological construction in germanic languages

PPTX 5 стр. 52,6 КБ Бесплатная загрузка

5 стр.

FaylHub.uz

Скачать через Telegram

Размер 52,6 КБ

Тип файла PPTX

Страницы 5

Обновлено Дек 2025

Предварительный просмотр (5 стр.)

Прокрутите вниз 👇

1 / 5

theme: theme: basic characters in morphological construction in germanic languages teacher: yokutkhon rakhmonkulova dutch and german seem to pose a problem for the hypothesis that head movement is driven be inflection. as is well known, verb movement shows a clear contrast between main and embedded clauses: only the former involve verb movement to a fronted position. if we assume a sentence structure compatible with kayne’s (1993) proposal, the prediction should be that finite verbs, since they are inflected for tense, should move to t, even in embedded clauses, and that movement to t should be visible as fronting. in addition, morphology seems not to predict at all whether a verb moves or not. i will argue, though, that in spite of appearances, morphology is crucially involved in determining whether (overt) verb movement takes place or not. zwart (1993), who develops a minimalist proposal on dutch syntax compatible with kayne (1993), …

2 / 5

a focus phrase in clause initial position, we can assume that the content of this morpheme has something to do with topic/focus licensing. is there, then, overt morphological evidence for this morpheme? i think the answer is yes if we again look at subject clitics. like in the case of the complementizer, subject clitics show strong attachment to the verb when the verb is in comp. in colloquial dutch, for instance, subject clitics can trigger reduction (thus allomorphy) on some verbal forms:22 now, can it be argued that the presence of enclisis on the verb constitutes a morpheme that belongs in comp? in fact, neither the finite verb nor the clitics seem to be morphemes which are related to comp. my proposal is that the comp morpheme is neither in the finite verb nor in the clitic, but in enclisis itself. that enclisis can constitute a morpheme of itself should …

3 / 5

be derived from syntactic processes (movement). but to the extent that morpho-phonological criteria single out these cases as candidates to be generated in the lexicon because of allomorphy and phonological attachment, the strong lexicalist hypothesis does not allow for the syntactic cliticization option. /docprops/thumbnail.jpeg

4 / 5

basic characters in morphological construction in germanic languages - Page 4

5 / 5

basic characters in morphological construction in germanic languages - Page 5

Хотите читать дальше?

Скачайте все 5 страниц бесплатно через Telegram.

Скачать полный файл

О "basic characters in morphological construction in germanic languages"

theme: theme: basic characters in morphological construction in germanic languages teacher: yokutkhon rakhmonkulova dutch and german seem to pose a problem for the hypothesis that head movement is driven be inflection. as is well known, verb movement shows a clear contrast between main and embedded clauses: only the former involve verb movement to a fronted position. if we assume a sentence structure compatible with kayne’s (1993) proposal, the prediction should be that finite verbs, since they are inflected for tense, should move to t, even in embedded clauses, and that movement to t should be visible as fronting. in addition, morphology seems not to predict at all whether a verb moves or not. i will argue, though, that in spite …

Этот файл содержит 5 стр. в формате PPTX (52,6 КБ). Чтобы скачать "basic characters in morphological construction in germanic languages", нажмите кнопку Telegram слева.

Теги: basic characters in morphologic… PPTX 5 стр. Бесплатная загрузка Telegram